Quick Find: #601, #602, #602C, #603, #603C, #604, #604C, #604 1/2, #604 1/2C, #605, #605C, #605 1/4, #605 1/2, #605 1/2C, #606, #606C, #607, #607C, #608, #608C
In a world where good
enough usually ain't good enough, Stanley decided to produce another series of
metal bench planes, called Bed Rock planes. These planes are, for all intents
and purposes, nothing but a variation of the more popular Bailey series. They
all have an adjustable frog, the brass depth adjustment knob, the lateral
lever, a lever cap, rosewood knob and tote, etc., just like the Bailey's. The
key difference between the two designs is found in the way the frog mates with
the bottom casting. For such a seemingly minor difference, the Bed Rock planes
were offered at a premium over the Bailey's, and it was a design that never
seemed to be very static nor nearly as popular as Stanley's wildly successful
Bailey line.
Since the primary difference between the two models is in their frog
designs, most of what follows is paid to that minutiae. If you don't wanna be
stuck in the quagmire of frog design, best find something else upon which to
ponder, like modern day uses of the amazing fiberboard planes, the #193A, #194, etc.
The Bailey frog underwent several modifications in an attempt to make it
seat better, and cheaper (each and every frog, and its receiving part of the
bottom casting, had to be machined for a proper fit). By about 1900, the frog
design had pretty much evolved into the design that most of us handtool
fundamentalists recognize - the angled bottom that mates to the bottom casting
at two areas, one along the rear of the mouth and the other at a raised
crossbar that spans the interior width of the bottom casting. In other words,
the frog does not mate with the bottom casting over the entire area of the
frog's bottom. So someone at Stanley, Justus Traut (the dude who gave us the #45, et al),
sniffed out a marketing opportunity here. What if a plane were offered that had
a frog design where its entire bottom mated with a corresponding area in the
bottom casting? There's sure to be megabucks reaped with this design. Or so
Stanley thought. The series was a dud when compared to the numbers of Bailey
planes sold, and it did have its bright spots, but it, like so many other
attempts to build a better mousetrap, also went belly-up after some 40 years of
production.
First,
the basic frog design of the Bed Rock needs explanation. The bottom casting has
a sloped and machined area onto which the frog seats, for its entire length.
The frog itself only differs from the conventional Bailey design in that its
bottom is flat and fully machined. A side view of the frog yields a wedge-like
appearance. There is one other subtle detail about the frog design - the frog's
bottom forms a broad and flat tongue, which fits into the bottom casting's
broad and flat groove. This was provided to prevent the frog from shifting side
to side, and guaranteed that the frog would move at a right angle (to the
mouth) when the frog was adjusted. So there you have it, a frog that mates with
the bottom casting over its (the frog's) full length and is self-centering as
well (this design remained static during the entire production of the Bed Rock
series). Sure woulda made me want to spend the extra 50 cents (average price
difference) to buy one of these babies back ca. 1900.
Someone else at Stanley, Edmund Schade, invented a little gizmo that found
permanent use on all Bed Rocks and was latter added to the Bailey line. It's a
lucky thing, too, that he did invent this otherwise it probably would have been
impossible for Stanley to justify the Bed Rocks; i.e., it may have been more
difficult to convince the tool-buying masses that the difference between the
two lines was of any great significance. This little gizmo, first offered on
the Bed Rock planes from their inception, is a little frog adjustment screw
that engages a captive fork secured to the back of the frog. This feature was
more of a gimmick than anything else, but it soon found favor amongst hand
planers across America. By giving the screw a turn, the frog moved either
forward or backward. Frog screwing, thought the stuff of the plane lover's
fancy, soon swept America, and it was inevitable that this mechanism would be
added to the Bailey design, which it was ca. 1910. It really is a wonder how
planedudes survived without this feature for the previous 30/40 years, but they
did. The true merit of this feature was proved when, during WWII, some of the
Bailey planes were offered without this. Think Stanley's complaint department
had its phones ringing off the hook over this?
The introduction of the
frog adjusment screw to the Bailey series left the Bed Rocks without any real
distinguishing pizazz, other than the bright red label used on the boxes of the
planes, as the lever cap still had to be removed to gain access to the screws
(that secured the frog to the main casting) in order to adjust the frog in the
first place. To address this, the New Britain stinktank (tm) had to come up
with some other gimmick to differentiate the Bed Rocks from the Baileys, and what
they decided upon was the capability to adjust the frog without removing the
lever cap and iron. Hey, think how much Joe Meatball's daily existence was
bettered simply by saving him from having to remove the lever cap, and then
backing off the two frog securing screws to adjust the frog, something that's
done at least once or twice a month or two. But, guess what? This swell feature
had already been solved a few years earlier by one of Stanley's main
competitors, Sargent, located in New Haven, CT, just a short trip south of New
Britain. On July 3, 1906, John Shaw received a patent for frog adjustment
without having to remove the lever cap and iron assembly. This innovation was
soon 'copied' by Edmund Schade, who came up with another way to accomplish the
same function, on March 14, 1911. Stanley surely must have perceived some
threat from Sargent over this, although the Sargent line of planes
incorporating Shaw's patent aren't all that common. For a detailed look at
Shaw's patent, click here.
Schade's novel way of frog adjusting was accomplished by the addition of two
frog clamping screws that flank either side of the frog adjusting screw. Each
of these screws is pointed (on the end without the slot) and engages two pins
which have a corresponding conical depressions milled into them. The pins fit
through the frog and into the bottom casting, and have no holding power by
themselves. The two screws apply a downward force on the pins when they are
tightened, thus locking the frog securely in position. By backing off the
screws, the pressure on the pins is relieved, and the frog can be moved forward
or backward by turning the frog adjustment screw. It's a neat and efficient
frog adjusting mechanism, but its real merit is somewhat questionable since
frog adjusting is not something done with any regularity, like, say, adjusting
the plane's set (depth of cut). Click here to see a blow-by-blow description from the hands of
Stanley's propaganda machine.
And speaking of the plane's set, that's exactly what changes whenever the
frog is adjusted forward or backward. Since the frog and its mating surface are
inclined toward the mouth, the frog moves closer to or farther from the mouth
as it's adjusted forward or backward respectively. With the iron secured to the
frog, it follows, then, that the iron likewise moves closer to or farther from
the mouth. Adjusting the frog forward increases the set, and adjusting it
backward decreases the set. Now, granted, the amount by which the set is
changed is small, but when using a smoother for finish work, or using any bench
plane on a very hard wood, the slightest change in the set needs to be
accounted for after the frog is adjusted, so there is really no true reduction
in the number of adjustments to the plane as the frog is repositioned. On the
plus side, however, you have another mechanism for adjusting the iron's set
should you ever break the adjusting fork - who would have guessed that Stanley
invented fault tolerant planing without their ever realizing it?
At the same
time the new frog securing screws were added, the bottom casting itself
underwent a change in appearance. Where the casting rises up around the frog,
on either side of the frog, the tops are lopped off flat, instead of the normal
round sides found on the earlier Bed Rocks and the Baileys. This change was
advertised as adding significantly to the strength and stiffness of the plane
as well as affording an increased area when the plane is used on its sides, a claim
that is rather dubious as Bed Rocks can be found with cracks about the main
casting in this supposed strengthened area.
WWII spelled the end for these planes, as it did for many other tools that
Stanley had offered for years. Most of these tools were on life support anyway,
and the war was the final nail in the coffin, the Bed Rocks included.
Other than the stuff I list above, there are some other telltale ways to
date your Bed Rocks. Chief among the other ways is the lever cap and its
embossing. The earliest models have "STANLEY/R. & L. Co./BED ROCK" cast in three separate lines (that's what the
/ means). Starting around 1910, the lever caps have "STANLEY/BED
ROCK" in two lines. A few years
later, just "BED ROCK"
is cast. From ca. 1925 onward, "STANLEY" is all that appears. There are other
differences in the models, but they are minor in the grand scheme of things
here.
What follows is the actual Bed Rock models. These parallel the Bailey planes
in function. As with those planes, the "C" designation means that the
plane has corrugations in the sole (for reducing friction as the plane forms a
vacuum with the wood); the "C" doesn't appear on the plane. These
planes can suffer the same general damage that the Baileys can, and for a
description of that damage, refer to the #3 of the Bailey series. The Bed Rocks can also show
damage about the frog clamping screws - sometimes you can find them with their
slots broken in which case you'll need to find replacements.
Only three of the planes in the series are considered anywhere near scarce,
the #602, #602C, and the #605 1/4. However,
there is a premium paid to acquire any of the planes when buying from dealers.
This, in the author's opinion, is due to the hype found within some books and
articles. If you want a better plane, and one that's less costly, go with the
Type 2 Bailey's. These are the best planes what Stanley ever did make.
#601 Smooth plane, 5
3/4L, 1 1/4"W, 1 1/4lbs, 2000-?.
Stanley never made one, but The Superior Works is. You can buy one yourself by clicking here.

There's a lot of stuff going on below the frog of the later Bed Rocks, and it's very apparent on this, the smallest planes of the series, when you try to jam a screwdriver down there to screw around with the frog. Still, they are popular planes with collectors and users of today, probably owing that to their unique look where everything is scaled down to make the plane look rather cute.
Be careful for counterfeit corrugations on this one. It's one of Stanley's scarcer planes, especially in the round top configuration, which opens it up for the crafty tool artisans to apply their handiwork.
While many users fancy this plane as a fine worker due to its heft, they aren't especially enamoured with the price tag that usually accompanies the tool. If it's heft you want, and you have the money to buy this guy, save your lunch money for a few months more, and buy a real killer smoothing plane, an English infill. You'll never regret it as they far out-perform any Bed Rock plane.
Probably the most commonly encountered size of the Bed Rock series.
This plane is one of the
scarcest of the entire Bed Rock series.
Note that this model can't be found with the earlier round sides as it
wasn't introduced until after the series underwent the design change of the
flat top side and the frog clamping screws.
Because the #605 1/4 is the Bed Rock
equivalent of the Bailey #5 1/4, which was a plane favored by the trade schools for
manual training, and because the Bed Rock planes, plane for plane, were sold at
a premium price over the Bailey equivalents, it follows that these planes
didn't sell well to the trade schools, thus accounting for their scarcity.
However, the planes were bought by some school districts, and it's possible (or
was possible) to find stashes of these planes in schools.
Stanley never offered a corrugated version of this plane in their catalogs.
This doesn't mean that they wouldn't possibly make one upon special request, as
Stanley did for other stuff, but if you ever see one, I'd be damn sure it was
legit before I plopped down more than $100 for it.
Pay attention to this, and the corrugated version's, iron. It's non-standard with the others in the series, and if you're in need of a replacement, you'll have to snag it from a similar vintage #5 1/2 or a #27 1/2.
The nearest Stanley got to designating a single plane with the sign of the beast, 666. Push one of these suckers backward over some oak and you'll hear Ozzy Osborne chanting "norm is god, norm is god, all hail norm, prince of darkness and everything that's wrong with the world!"
Push this one backward, and you'll hear Slim Whitman caterwaul "Shake Your Groove Thing." Yeah, yeah.....
[ START ] | [ PREV ] | [ NEXT ] | [
END ]
[ HOME ]
Copyright
(c) 1998-2008 by Patrick A. Leach. All Rights Reserved. No part may be
reproduced by any means without the express written permission of the author.