In a former life, before telling The Man to KMA, I was
a software dork. There, I said it. One of the requirements of being such a dork
is that you must cruise the internet, or what the media pundits have labelled
"The Information Superhighway." I'm also a tool fanatic. These two
afflictions led me to that place where I could converse with similar sufferers
- rec.woodworking, aka rec.norm, the news group for those computer literates
who also have a life.
This effort was prompted by
several folks asking me about the Stanley planes that they own, or saw while
out cruising for tools. I found that many of the questions they asked were the
same ones asked over and over. For the sake of consistency, and for the economy
of my time, I decided to do a 'brain dump' of what I know about Stanley planes
- what they look like, what they do, what common parts are missing, what flaws
they suffered during use, etc.
All of my effort was done as
a lark. I never once thought that what I was writing would ever evolve into a
'cult classic.' The first version of this effort was done in the pre-dawn
darkness while my eyes were propped open with toothpicks; there were glaring
errors of omission and misinformation most of which I can attribute to the
early morning cobwebs that cluttered my mind. So, after having chucked the
software gig, it was either sitting in front of the tube while watching Jerry
Springer and strumming my lips or doing something constructive. Opting for the
latter, with the donnybrooks of Springer as background noise, I embarked upon a
rewrite of Blood and Gore to make it more thorough and accurate. It will never
be a work considered done as new information about the company and the planes
that they produced seems to surface daily.
The style of most of what I
write is tongue in cheek, but some of it very serious (like the information
about the #45 and #55). Afterall, a source of information
about the tools should include the good, the bad, and the ugly, all of which
Stanley managed to make.
The physical data of each
entry was referenced from Alvin Sellens' pioneer work, The Stanley Plane (now
out of print), and from John Walter's current book, Antique and Collectible
Stanley Tools. Both of these books cross-reference the original tool catalogues
and literature produced by Stanley as the source for their information. Other
than that, everything that follows each listing is from the dark corners of my
mind.
This information is not so much offered
to indicate the rarity or collectability of each tool, even though some mention
of that is made. It's hoped that the information within will be used as a field
guide while doing the tool hunt. If it is possible to classify Stanley planes
into two groups (hey, the legacy of being a former computer dork still makes me
see the world with a binary modus operandi), where one group may be considered
as common, and the other not so common, then the booklet can serve a useful
purpose given the aforementioned distinction. An asterisk, represented by the
ascii character '*', found at the end of each listing indicates that the plane
falls into the not so common category. Its value is entirely up to you.
The booklet also ignores the
cheaper brands of Stanley planes. Remember, this originally was a guide for
those guys who intended to use what they purchased. I can't, in good
conscience, recommend that someone use a Four Square or Handyman plane over a
Bailey or a Bed Rock. In my disturbed mind, Stanley's lesser planes were the
first trickle of oil to grease the slippery slope of the decline of handtool
quality, which now leaves us with the junk manufactured today.
A few things to mention that
will spare me some typing - all length measurements are for the soles, and all
width measurements are for the irons. The weight of each plane follows its
measurements, which is in turn followed by the years the plane was offered. The
planes may not have been in production for the timespan listed, which is
usually the case for the rarer planes. It was often that these 'braindead'
planes were offered until they sold out the initial production run.
Most of the planes have
their number cast into them. Those that never had their number cast into them
are noted. The "C" designation means that the plane has corrugations
in the sole; the "C" doesn't appear on the plane.
It's inevitable that once something becomes
collectable or valuable, it also gives rise to fakes, copies, and repairs.
These planes are no different than that of any other field of collecting where
unscrupulous, get-rich-quick, ought-to-be-making-license-plates-for-a-living,
types abound.
Fortunately, the fakes are
few and far between. These are covered, in sufficient detail, in the relevant
listings. Copies are also somewhat small in number, but they are not made to
fool anyone. Other copies are those tools that were made directly from an
original tool, usually by a patternmaker for his own use. These are rather easy
to spot since they are smaller than the originals and often have a grainier
texture to their non-machined surfaces.
Repairs are the real bane of
collecting. It's been going on for decades in other fields, and is now part of
the tool scene. If it's easy to repair, and to fool collectors of, mechanical
banks, then it's a relative picnic to do the same with tools. Chips and missing
chunks of castings are very easy to fill using finesse welding. The welds are
colored to match their surrounding and then are machined to be unnoticeable.
These are very difficult to detect, and one should always be suspicious of
repairs to areas where the tool is susceptible to breakage. You're on your own
when examining the tool. An honest person will point out repairs, so know your
source!
Another area of concern is
the tool's finish and its originality. There are many starving artist would-be
Picassos in this field, where taking a beat up tool and 'metamorphosizing' it
into a work of art worthy of some champagne and brie gala preview, is becoming
more commonplace. The re-machining of surfaces and the re-japanning of painted
surfaces is often used to make the tool appear as something it's not. Usually,
a close scrutinization of the piece will reveal a slip-up by the 'artist;' a
drop of paint someplace it shouldn't be, a small area of rust found in a
hard-to-reach place, a replacement part that doesn't match the vintage of the
tool, etc. As with repairs, know your dealer. If you have any questions about
the tool you're buying, get it vetted by a third, fourth, fifth party. It's
your money you're spending, afterall.
There are a wad of Stanley planes, many of which fit
into nice categories. Blood and Gore was written in numerical sequence
following Stanley's bizarre numbering system from #1 to #608C. Fortunately, some of Stanley's efforts fit into
categories, and Blood and Gore treats these planes as a separate listing; e.g.,
the Bailey line of planes, the transitionals, the Bed Rocks, etc. In total,
there are 15 major parts of Blood and Gore. You can visit them sequentially, or
jump right to the part in interest simply by finding the number on the tool in
question and referencing it against the hyperlinked categories listed below. Eventually,
I hope to make this queryable, where you can enter a category or a plane number
and get back just the listing for the tool(s). Stay tuned.
It's important to note that
these files are loaded with wads of images and will likely take time to download.
I hope you find that time well spent. If you don't, email me (leach@supertool.com) with complaints, suggestions,
questions, attaboys, tools for sale, etc. Furthermore, if you'd like to see the
author of this blather stammer, bumble, and otherwise look like a total chump
live on videotape as he describes these Stanley planes, follow this link to my
chum Anatol's
page for more
info.
Pick a Plane, any Plane......
[ START ] | [ PREV ] | [ NEXT ] | [ END ]
[ HOME
]
Copyright
(c) 1998-2008 by Patrick A. Leach. All Rights Reserved. No part may be
reproduced by any means without the express written permission of the author.